UEM1 — UEM1 TASK 2: OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION AND PATIENT TREATMENT PLAN ADVANCED PSYCHIATRIC MENTAL HEALTH CARE OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESC
10/20/25, 6:48 PM WGU Performance Assessment
UEM1 — UEM1 TASK 2: OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION AND PATIENT TREATMENT PLAN
ADVANCED PSYCHIATRIC MENTAL HEALTH CARE OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS ACROSS CARE SETTINGS — D347
PRFA — UEM1
Preparation Task Overview Submissions Evaluation Report
EVALUATION REPORT — ATTEMPT 2 — APPROVAL NEEDED Overall Evaluator Comments
EVALUATOR COMMENTS
To support you in demonstrating proficiency, you’ll be unable to resubmit your task until you’ve consulted with a Course Instructor.
You presented an organized evaluation of Acute Stress Disorder, clearly linking Aaron’s symptoms to the traumatic loss of his friend. Your treatment plan demonstrates strong clinical reasoning with goals that are both measurable and evidence-based, utilizing Trauma-Focused CBT and Imagery Rehearsal Therapy to address his core symptoms of nightmares, avoidance, and intrusive memories Please review the comments in the rubric report about necessary revisions.
A1. OSCE PANOPTO VIDEO RECORDING
Approaching Competence The video recording is not audible.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The OSCE video link is audible. Several aspects of the initial psychiatric evaluation are missing or need further clarification. Please ensure that the documentation and OSCE are aligned with the clinical presentation.
A2. PATIENT INTAKE FORM
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/012382496/course/26020010/task/3765/evaluation-report 1/5
10/20/25, 6:48 PM WGU Performance Assessment
Approaching Competence The Patient Intake Form is not complete.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The patient intake form includes information about the treatment plan of an individual with a complaint of nightmares, flashbacks, and insomnia. The response is incomplete because the information documented in the intake form does not align with some of the information discussed in the OSCE.
B1. DIAGNOSIS
Competent The diagnosis aligns with the clinical presentation.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B2. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES
Competent All differential diagnoses align with the clinical presentation.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B2A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES RATIONALES
Competent The rationale for each differential diagnosis is plausible and includes evidence from the patient interview and support from a scholarly source that aligns with the corresponding differential diagnosis.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B3. SMART TREATMENT GOALS
Competent Both SMART treatment goals are complete and align with the diagnosis and clinical presentation. And each goal includes an appropriate objective for monitoring patient progress.
There are no comments for this aspect.
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/012382496/course/26020010/task/3765/evaluation-report 2/5
10/20/25, 6:48 PM WGU Performance Assessment
B4. PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TREATEMENTS
Competent Both psychotherapeutic treatments align with the diagnosis, clinical presentation, treatment goals, and objectives.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B4A. PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS RATIONALES
Competent The rationale for each treatment is plausible and includes reasonable evidence from the patient interview and support from a scholarly source that aligns with the psychotherapeutic treatment.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B5. PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Approaching Competence The pharmacological treatment, or lack thereof, does not align with the diagnosis or clinical presentation.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission includes the use of melatonin as a pharmacological treatment. The response is insufficient because a pharmacological treatment that aligns with the primary diagnosis and clinical presentation is not provided.
B5A. PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT RATIONALE
Approaching Competence The rationale is not plausible or does not include reasonable evidence from the patient interview. Or support from a scholarly source is missing or does not align with the pharmacological treatment.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
The submission included a rationale for the use of melatonin. The response is insufficient because rationales for pharmacological treatments of the primary diagnosis are missing.
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/012382496/course/26020010/task/3765/evaluation-report 3/5
10/20/25, 6:48 PM WGU Performance Assessment
B6. INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM AND RATIONALES
Competent Both interdisciplinary team members align with the diagnosis and treatment goals. The rationale for each is plausible.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B7. LAB OR DIAGNOSTIC
Competent The medical lab or diagnostic aligns with the diagnosis and clinical presentation.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B7A. LAB OR DIAGNOSTIC RATIONALE
Competent The rationale is plausible and includes evidence from the patient interview and support from a scholarly source that aligns with the treatment plan.
There are no comments for this aspect.
B8. PATIENT-AND FAMILY-CENTERED PSYCHOEDUCATION
Competent Both given points are plausibly addressed and align with the treatment plan and the clinical presentation.
There are no comments for this aspect.
C. REFLECTION
Competent The reflection is plausible and relates to the student’s performance as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner during the patient interview.
There are no comments for this aspect.
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/012382496/course/26020010/task/3765/evaluation-report 4/5
10/20/25, 6:48 PM WGU Performance Assessment
D. DIFFERENT CLINICAL SETTING
Competent The changes are plausible and align with the opposite setting and the patient diagnosis. There are no comments for this aspect.
E. SOURCES
Approaching Competence The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.
EVALUATOR COMMENTS: ATTEMPT 2
A list of 8 references was present, including one on trauma focuses cognitive behavioral therapies. The application of sources’ formatting was inconsistent because some content that has been summarized does not include accurate in-text citations and corresponding references.
F. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
Competent This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
There are no comments for this aspect.
https://tasks.wgu.edu/student/012382496/course/26020010/task/3765/evaluation-report 5/5
